Oskar Krawczyk – blog.olicio.us

14 responses so far. Care to add one yourself?

1. Rafał "RaVbaker" Piekarski July 19th, 2007 at 16:28

   • 

   • But you should remember that this is only test of selectors not every other aspects of these frameworks.

     But IMHO you’re right - MooTools Rocks!

2. adremja July 19th, 2007 at 17:29

   • 

   • http://jquery.com/blog/2007/07/01/jquery-113-800-faster-still-20kb/ ;)

3. Nate July 19th, 2007 at 19:12

   • 

   • jQuery is currently on v1.1.3.1 with significant speed enhancements. Just FYI.

4. Paweł Kaczmarek July 19th, 2007 at 19:34

   • 

   • Yep in this test moo rocks jQ. I prefer jQ tho, thanks to its simplicity

5. nightman July 19th, 2007 at 22:50

   • 

   • Tutaj masz porównanie wersji 1.1.3 z bloga jQuery. Nie jest już tak źle

     http://jquery.com/blog/2007/07/01/jquery-113-800-faster-still-20kb/

6. Dziudek July 20th, 2007 at 04:14

   • 

   • On IE jQuery is faster than mootools ;) More informations » ;)

7. Pizzadude July 20th, 2007 at 09:21

   • 

   • Nie na darmo jest siÄ™ fanem MooTools. ^^

8. Oskar Krawczyk July 20th, 2007 at 09:35

   • 

   • Hmm, still 3635 vs 162 = jQ sucks ass big times.

     @PaweÅ‚ Kaczmarek, oh come on, cut me some slack here - MooTools’ not simple? With all due respect but how retarded you have to be not to find it super-easy to use.

9. Paweł Kaczmarek July 20th, 2007 at 10:42

   • 

   • @Oskar Krawczyk, You know, I just do find it simplier. Embed script, add one line and here you are. I did not say Moo isnt super-easy to use BUT that I prefer jQ. Both frameworks are awesome and competition makes them even better.

     Lets get back to the results, take a quick look at these http://extjs.com/blog/2007/07/10/css-selectors-speed-myths/. Thats reason why it turnt out slower.

     And again, It is yours and only yours decision which script will you use. Both are super-great BUT I prefer jQ. Amen.

     Greetz, Pawel (pryngiel)

10. bennyb September 10th, 2007 at 16:55

    • 

    • Have you tested Mootools with the new super fast jQuery 1.1.4? I hear it is a lot faster than Mootools 1.2dev

11. Oskar Krawczyk September 11th, 2007 at 07:27

    • 

    • No I haven’t… THEY said the old jQ was super-fast which obviously was slow like dog poo, so basically I have no reason to believe in the uber-fastness of jQ, my friend.

12. Chase July 14th, 2008 at 06:48

    • 

    • Neat

13. arbuz March 17th, 2009 at 06:45

    • 

    • try implement drag&drop effect for many divs (for example 10). You will see that mootools is slow for firefox 3. i dont know how jquery is resolving this but extjs is much better….

14. Oskar Krawczyk March 17th, 2009 at 10:51

    • 

    • Try disabling Firebug beforehand.

Leave a Reply